Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:58
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Do you remember one day, you put a deep smile on someone's face and made them very happy?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This Plant You’ve Never Heard of Can Do What Scientists Thought Was Impossible - SciTechDaily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What are the extra benefits of a smart TV?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Chrysler Is 100 Years Old, and It's 'Back On,' Stellantis Design Boss Gilles Says - Road & Track
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why men with broken heart syndrome are more likely to die, according to experts - East Idaho News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Dormant Stem Cells May Hold Key to Restoring Sense of Smell - Neuroscience News